I have internet and that's not a small thing to have
because there are 60% of people in the world who doesn't have right to internet
and if we look at least developed countries only 1 out of 10 people have internet access
along with this there are many countries which doesn't allow their citizens to access specific contents, they restrict it to do so
But in today's generation no development is possible with out digitalization
so looking at the suppressive tactics of the governments
In 2016 UNHRC said that Right To Internet should be made a fundamental right
Many years back like this only they asked for a new right to become a fundamental right which was Right To Education
So now let's talk about India
In past 10 years there were around 400 Internet shutdowns in India
and if we talk about past 1 year
On 4th Aug 2019 when Indian parliament revoked Article 370 from the constitution
and separated the state of Jammu and Kashmir in to two union territories i.e Jammu and kasmir and laddakh
and for maintaining the security the government imposed section 144
which prohibits the assembly of more than 5 peoples
along with this they did Internet Shutdown and this shutdown becomes the longest internet shutdown of India
So due to security concerns, on 4th Aug 2019 the internet services of J&k was suspended
and it gets restore after 213 days i.e on 4th March 2020
and that's why it becomes the longest shutdown of the country
between these two dates there was 3 important judgement's made
which in future decides the new right of the nation, Right to Internet
In today's video we will discuss about these 3 imp cases
1st case is of Faheema Shirin R.K. v. State of Kerala
In this Faheema Shirin who is a college student,
in their girls hostel there was a rule that they are not allowed to use cell phones between 6 to10
opposing this restriction of the hostel this case was filed in front of Justice P V Asha single judge bench of the kerala high court
keeping in mind the learning process and development of the students, this court produced an imp judgement
and said that Right To Access Internet is a fundamental right
and it was added with Art.21 of the constitution i.e Right to privacy
and Right to Access Internet was added in relation with Right to Education
So this was the case of Faheema shirin
2nd case is Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India
Now this case directly relates with Jammu and kashmir
this case was filed on 10th January, in which the internet ban was challenged, which was imposed on 4th Aug
they said that restricting physical movement along with shut downing all the mediums of online communication
violates fundamental right Art. 19 of the constitution as Right to Internet is a part of Art. 19 (1a)
Supreme court said, due to immediate threat or security concern a temporary ban on any services is permissible
but for indefinite period, internet services cant be suspended
the balance should be maintained between national security and human rights
So after the judgment of 10th january, the lowest speed 2G internet was allowed in J&K
but after the case of Anuradha Bhasin one more cased was filed on court
the case was of Foundation of Media Professionals v. Union of India
in this case the ban on 3G and 4G internet service in J&K was challenged
this case is popularly also known as 4G case
In this case they said that such ban on internet services completely violates Right to Education
Right to Profession, Right to Health and many fundamental rights
Supreme court issued directions to resume 4G services and also setup a committee along this
After much discussion, center directed to resume 4G services as a trial basis on limited areas of J&K after 15 Aug
So we will cover the whole discussion quickly through this timeline
it all started on 4th Aug 2019
when internet services of J&K got suspended for indefinite period due to national security concerns
Now come to Sept 2019
the case of Faheema shirin, in which kerala the most literate state of India said that Right to Internet is a fundametal right
you should also know that Kerala State government is running a project
in which they are providing internet at a subsidized rate to 20 lakh poor families
so this was Faheema shirins case
now we will look at Jan 2020, Anuradha Bhasins judgement
in this case supreme court said that due to immediate threat
you can disable services temporarily but indefinite ban is not at all right
and after this case the 2G services got resumed in J&K
Finally comes the case of Foundation For Media Professionals
in this case supreme court said that
it is very important to maintain balance between national interest and human rights
and due to this case 3G and 4G services got resumed in some areas of J&K
So today's discussion was on Right to Internet
we discussed 3 important cases
I hope you all liked today's video and you are using your Right to Internet positively
For getting more video updates like this you can subscribe my channel
and you can also connect me with on my Instagram page @finologylegal
and for reading updates like this you can also visit my blogs