Study of Fayol and Taylor - Comparison, Differences, Similarity

Henri Fayol, a French industrialist with experience in a French Mining Company, is renowned as the "Father of General Management" due to his significant contributions. He formulated fourteen management principles and categorized industrial organization activities into six groups: Technical, Commercial, Financial, Security, Accounting, and Management.

Frederick W. Taylor, an American mechanical engineer, worked at the Bethlehem Steel Company and made noteworthy contributions to management theory. He pioneered scientific techniques of management, becoming the first to apply scientific methods to enterprise management. Taylor earned the title of the "Father of Scientific Management."

The contributions of Fayol and Taylor complement each other, but there are several distinctions between their approaches.

Fayol vs. Taylor - A Comparison:

• Personality: Fayol was a practitioner, while Taylor was a scientist.

• Perspective: Fayol formulated principles from a top-level management standpoint, whereas Taylor designed principles for lower-level operations.

• Unity of Command: Fayol strictly adhered to the principle of Unity of Command, while Taylor's approach deviated, emphasizing functional foremanship.

• Applicability: Fayol's principles are universally applicable due to their flexibility, whereas Taylor's techniques are more specific and less flexible.

• Basis of Formation: Fayol's principles were derived from personal experiences, while Taylor's principles stemmed from experimentation and observation.

• Focus: Fayol's main focus was on overall administration, while Taylor concentrated on enhancing employee productivity.

• Expression: Fayol's principles are presented as a general theory of administration, whereas Taylor's techniques are formulated as scientific management.

• Human Element: Fayol's principles prioritize human elements with concepts like equity, initiative, and stability of tenure. Taylor's approach assigns less significance to human elements, emphasizing increased production.

• Emphasis: Fayol emphasized general administration theory, managerial functions, and principles. Taylor's emphasis lay in work and tool standardization to improve efficiency.

In essence, Henri Fayol's emphasis was on universal principles of administration and the broader managerial context, while Frederick Taylor concentrated on optimizing productivity through standardized techniques and procedures.

Both Frederick Taylor and Henri Fayol have significantly contributed to the development of the science of management. Their contributions were complementary and focused on personnel and management at various levels. Taylor concentrated on operational efficiency from the supervisory perspective, moving upward, while Fayol approached management from top-level management downward, affording him a broader view. The following differences and similarities can be observed between their approaches:

Differences:

1. Viewpoint: Taylor's emphasis was on operational efficiency and improvement at the shop floor level, while Fayol analyzed management from a top-down perspective, considering the broader functions of managers.

2. Philosophy Terminology: Taylor termed his philosophy "Scientific Management," while Fayol described his approach as "A General Theory of Administration."

3. Aim: Taylor aimed to enhance labor productivity and eliminate waste through work and tool standardization. In contrast, Fayol sought to establish a universal theory of management and advocated the need for teaching this theory.

4. Focus: Taylor's principles were centered on facts of management, applicable to the shop floor, whereas Fayol concentrated on managerial functions and general principles of management, which could be applied across various domains.

5. Human Aspect: Taylor's approach tended to disregard human elements, viewing them as mere components, whereas Fayol recognized the importance of human elements, incorporating principles like initiative, esprit de corps, and equity.

Similarity:

Both Taylor and Fayol underscored the significance of mutual cooperation between employers and employees.

Spheres of Human Activity: Fayol's principles are more universally applicable than Taylor's, although Taylor's philosophy has evolved with modern developments. Fayol's management principles have withstood the test of time and are still considered fundamental to management theory.

Psychologists' Perspective: From a psychological standpoint, Taylor's approach exhibited certain drawbacks:

1. Human Factors: Taylor's approach often neglected human factors, treating workers as mere machines and overlooking their needs and aspirations.

2. Separation of Planning and Doing: Taylor's approach separated planning from execution, potentially causing issues in the execution process.

3. Dissatisfaction: Taylor's approach could lead to worker dissatisfaction when individual performance was compared to that of others.

4. No Best Way: Taylor's scientific management did not provide a singular best solution to problems.

In summary, Taylor's focus was on operational efficiency, while Fayol's approach emphasized general administration. Taylor's perspective was micro-focused, primarily applicable to factory settings, while Fayol's approach had a macro-view, encompassing general management principles applicable across various domains. Taylor's achievements lie in scientific management, whereas Fayol is recognized as the father of management principles, emphasizing a more comprehensive approach to management theory.

Thank You